Reference passing question

Started by Jeff, July 07, 2008, 05:57:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jeff

How useful can reference passing using default functors be if we cannot define contexts locally?



Limiting context creation to global symbols puts a hard wall on the complexity of an application.  What if I do not know ahead of time how many contexts I will need?



I can create a gensym-type function that will create a new, unique symbol in MAIN whenever I need, but that pollutes the global namespace.



Is there any way to dynamically generate namespaces based on runtime conditions?
Jeff

=====

Old programmers don\'t die. They just parse on...



http://artfulcode.net\">Artful code

Lutz

#1
you can use this:


(define (create-context-from-name str)
(sym str (sym str MAIN))
)

(create-context-from-name "Foo") => Foo:Foo




creates a context with default functor

Jeff

#2
Yes, and that still pollutes my global namespace.  I don't see why there is such an issue over being able to create contexts out of local variables.  It may not be the most efficient way for all programs, but it should still be there for those that do need it.



Also, using the new dictionary contexts, I seem to be having difficulty with this:


(define foo:foo)
(foo "x" 0)
(foo "x" (+ 1 (foo "x"))) ; => ERR: value expected in function + : (foo "x")


Any idea why that doesn't work?
Jeff

=====

Old programmers don\'t die. They just parse on...



http://artfulcode.net\">Artful code

Lutz

#3
QuoteI don't see why there is such an issue over being able to create contexts out of local variables.



(define (foo x)
    (let (ctx)
        (println "ctx:" ctx)
        (context 'ctx)
        (set 'ctx:x x)
        (println "current context:" (context))
        (println "symbols in ctx: " (symbols ctx))
        (println "ctx:x: " ctx:x)
        (println "x:" x)
        (delete 'ctx)
))

> (foo 999)
ctx:nil
current context:ctx
symbols in ctx: (x)
ctx:x: 999
x:999
true
>


You still can do it, if you delete the context explicitly before exiting the function.


(foo "x" (+ 1 (foo "x"))) => gives error

(foo "y" (+ 1 (foo "x"))) => would work


first should work too, I will look into it. Looks like we need yet another update of 9.4.1 to 9.4.2 :-((

Jeff

#4
That's great.  That is something that I really needed.
Jeff

=====

Old programmers don\'t die. They just parse on...



http://artfulcode.net\">Artful code