Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - bubba88

#1
Anything else we might add? /
December 04, 2008, 12:10:16 PM
Thanks, everyone:)



I will report you as soon, as I achieve something worthy to discuss.
#2
Anything else we might add? / Re: Ok
December 03, 2008, 10:40:25 AM
Quote from: "xytroxon"And it's true, newLISP is not 100% compliant with the LISP standard... But it tries to better LISP by simplifying and focusing on what you want to use LISP for... LISt Processing... CONS in Common Lisp is more low level... You can create a cell that represents almost anything... In newLISP you can only create a list... So while Common Lisp is more flexible for computer scientist's research projects, newLISP tries to be consistent and easier for non-computer scientists to use it make their laundry and shopping lists ;)

-- xytroxon


Excuse me for my misunderstanding, I thought about newLISP as a high-level language for intellectual systems programming, with dynamic and reflective structure. From this position, as i understand (I do these conclusions from your post), the Common Lisp (with its "academic" style) is more preferable for me.
#3
Anything else we might add? /
December 03, 2008, 10:26:33 AM
Quote from: "cormullion"Do you have to write a compiler first? Or does the machine just 'know' the language...?


I think it would be better to do it as "hardware" as possible, so i think - yes - the machine should just know the language. But a variant with some intermediate language is appropriate, too.
#4
Anything else we might add? / Ok
December 02, 2008, 12:02:40 PM
Actually, I thoght about creating something like VHDL template for such machines in FGPA.

Is that a bad idea too?
#5
Hello.



If anyone has an idea about the subj - please, post it here.