A quick glance into the source indicates that "println" is not very i18n friendly, though I don't have too much experience with it myself. Thus, my theory is that the string in newlisp is correct (i.e., the same as the other), but presented badly by println. Maybe a raw string output works better?Quote from: "ralph.ronnquist"
(write 1 <text>)Code Select
I modefied the program with your mehod, but the question is sitll not to solve.
Code Select
(write 1 ((((:fetch-all r) 0) 1) 1))
and I checked mysql code is
Code Select
mysql> show variables like 'character%';
+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| character_set_client | utf8 |
| character_set_connection | utf8 |
| character_set_database | utf8 |
| character_set_filesystem | binary |
| character_set_results | utf8 |
| character_set_server | utf8 |
| character_set_system | utf8 |
| character_sets_dir | /usr/share/mysql/charsets/ |
+--------------------------+----------------------------+