G'day everyone
I'm starting to like this language. But I'm still approaching it as one who has been 'polluted' by other languages.
Is there a better way to do this?
(dolist
(i
(parse
(read-file "c:\temp\data") "rn"
)
)
(begin
(set 'j (reverse (parse i "t")))
(if (not (empty? j))
(begin
;(print j "n")
(set 'k (j 0))
(set 'l (j 1))
;(print (string (cons 'find (list k l 1))))
(set 'm (eval-string (string (cons 'find (list k l 1)))))
(when (true? m)
;(print m "n")
(print "afti(" l ", " k ")=" (slice l m) "n" )
)
)
)
)
)
Kind regards,
Bruce.
In you first postet version you ask for set and multiple argument:
(set 'k (j 0) 'l (j 1))
Quote from: "HPW"
In you first postet version you ask for set and multiple argument:
(set 'k (j 0) 'l (j 1))
Marvellous. Thanks very much.
Bruce.
instead of:
(set 'm (eval-string (string (cons 'find (list k l 1)))))
you could do:
(set 'm (eval (cons 'find (list k l 1))))
or even better:
(set 'm (apply find (list k l 1))
ps: welcome to newLISP
Quote from: "Lutz"
or even better:
(set 'm (apply find (list k l 1))
ps: welcome to newLISP
Thanks for the welcome. And thanks for the help with the code -- much appreciated!!