Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - tumble

#2
vedaviz, you need to talk to a computational linguist.  I doubt that there are any reading this forum.



(And although it's not really relevant, I can't type "computational linguist" in any context without linking to this cartoon: http://www.xkcd.com/114">http://www.xkcd.com/114 .)
#3
Quote from: "Kazimir Majorinc"It would be nice to have some function that returns list of the caller functions, similarly like (sys-info 3) returns the level of recursion. Although it sounds quite 'dangerous' it can actually provide some debugging facilities, i.e. functions could react if called by someone they do not appreciate.


The Io language has this.  I think it's built it at rather a low level, though.
#4
Awesome!
#5
My thoughts are at http://xeny.net/why%20I%20am%20not%20on%20Facebook%20any%20more">http://xeny.net/why%20I%20am%20not%20on ... any%20more">http://xeny.net/why%20I%20am%20not%20on%20Facebook%20any%20more
#6
Thank you!
#7
I've been wanting a better syntax for defining default functors (blah:blah), but coincidentally Lutz has just posted one at http://newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=4029">http://newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/vie ... =16&t=4029">http://newlispfanclub.alh.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=4029 !
#8
Thanks, Lutz.  I really like the syntax of that definition (def-static).