Text only | Text with Images

newLISP Fan Club

Forum => So, what can you actually DO with newLISP? => Dragonfly => Topic started by: itistoday on March 22, 2010, 07:06:09 PM

Title: Dragonfly 0.70 Released!
Post by: itistoday on March 22, 2010, 07:06:09 PM
Finally! Here are the changes:


Code Select
 * all code uses new ++,--,extend,write,read functions (still compatible with older newlisps)
  * added 'extract' and '<-' functions to core utils
  * Route.Resource has been updated with a 'catch-all' function.
  * added documentation for MAX_POST_LENGTH in request.lsp
  * $BINARY can now handle large data (compensated for a newLISP bug in 'read-buffer').
  * DF:activate-plugin can now be used to load all lisp files in a directory
  * db/database_utils includes for-query-with-db, assoc-row-with-db, query-cell-with-db and others
  * db/database_orm - DB.OBJ - a very simple ORM for DF.DB
  * db/database_sqlite3 updated to version 1.2 (see its docs for what's new)
  * fixed Jeff's JSON.lsp plugin (switched to " instead of ' for strings)
  * fixed bug in definition of define-smacro
  * Response:cookie now returns correct value (full cookie as list) when given only key

Download 0.70 from here. (//http)



This version should be safe to use with the latest version of newLISP.



Also, Dragonfly has moved off Google Code, its official repository is now located on GitHub:



http://github.com/taoeffect/dragonfly-newlisp



If you prefer using Mercurial (like I do), you can use this (//http).
Title: Re: Dragonfly 0.70 Released!
Post by: itistoday on March 23, 2010, 09:48:32 AM
The new DB stuff can be found here:



http://www.rundragonfly.com/api/db
Title: Re: Dragonfly 0.70 Released!
Post by: cormullion on March 23, 2010, 10:44:08 AM
Cool! I suppose it works well with 10.1 too.



I expect to upgrade when I get some time to examine the files which need updating.



Thanks
Title: Re: Dragonfly 0.70 Released!
Post by: cormullion on March 24, 2010, 12:46:58 PM
Running on newLISP v.10.1.10:


Code Select
ERR: symbol is protected in function define : (read source-string)
called from user defined function load-once
called from user defined function load-files-in-dir

Presumably that's due to:



(
Code Select
when (< (sys-info -2) 10111)
(constant (global 'term) name)
(constant (global 'read) read-buffer)
(constant (global 'write) write-buffer)
)

and I've defined read elsewhere?
Title: Re: Dragonfly 0.70 Released!
Post by: itistoday on March 24, 2010, 06:56:41 PM
Yes, most likely, as the stack trace suggests, you should search your project for "source-string" to try to find where you're using it.



These declarations were necessary to be compatible with the recent changes in newLISP.
Title: Re: Dragonfly 0.70 Released!
Post by: cormullion on March 25, 2010, 11:27:57 AM
Yes - I've found it.



You have to laugh, really - I  tried to keep everything on 10.1 and I still got bitten by the not-yet-installed 10.2! :) Still, I like the way you tried to keep compatibility with 10.1 and 10.2.



I'll leave it alone for now - it will only become a problem when something upgrades to 10.2.... :(
Text only | Text with Images